In: Root » Legal and finance » Insurance
You've probably heard that the mandated switch to using ICD-10 codes for claims filing has been delayed by a few years until October 2013. You can breathe a little easier for now, but it is a good time to evaluate how your office will implement the changes now. And what do these changes mean for your practice? A little background...as you know, medical insurance companies do not pay for "tension headaches" and "15 minute office visits for an established patient" - insurance companies pay for diagnosis codes like 401.1 and procedure CPT codes such as 84450. ICD-9 codes, procedure and HCPCS codes all describe patient complaints, illness, procedures and supplies for a submitted claim. The ICD-9 codes currently in use were adopted in the 1960s by the U.S. Since then there have been many advances in medicine. Under the current ICD-9 system, the room to expand is limited. By adding codes under the new system, there will be space to expand and it will allow for more specific tracking. How much so? Think there are too many codes now? Try 68,000 ICD-10 codes, up from 13,000 ICD-9 codes now. For CPT codes we go from 3000 codes now to 87,000 codes! What is more, ICD-9 codes will go from up to 5 digits (ex. 307.81) to up to 7. The deadline for switching is 2013. In fact, this is not the first time ICD-10 was supposed to be implemented. Many providers have put off switching, taking a wait and see approach since the requirement has been delayed in the past. However, this time is different as insurers have begun to put processes in place in preparation. If you now do your billing in-house and file using on-site software, the switch to ICD-10 could be a large expense for updates to your software as well. What's more, by January 1, 2012 all physicians must begin using the new version of HIPAA transaction standards known as 5010 in order to file claims. This is because the current 4010 version does not support ICD-10 codes. Even if you believe you can put off switching to ICD-10, it is time to consider what it will take to update to the 5010 transaction standards. This comes from a recent article in the Wall Street Journal: "CMS says it expects implementation of the new system initially will boost by as much as 10% the number of claims returned because of coding mistakes. But a study by the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association of insurers predicts coding errors are likely to rise between 10% and 25% in the first year." This is a good time to consider either a switch to outsourcing your billing to pass the cost off to a billing company, or at least consider an internet based claims filing program. The advantages with internet based electronic claims filing is that the updates are built in to the platform at no cost to you other than the cost of using the service. This could potentially save you thousands upfront as well as over the long run. The whole purpose of the switch to ICD-10 is to accommodate the annual updates in technology and procedures. You can be sure that any in-house software you use for claims filing will require annual updates that can represent cost to you as well. You can see why it will be more important then ever to have remote medical coders knowledgeable on the new codes as a part of your practice. Implementation of the new system will be costly, so when the time comes, out-sourcing your coding could be a way to reduce expenses. If that is the route you choose, there are physicians billing services that can assist you.
|
|||||||||||||
Disclaimer
1) E-articles is not responsible for the information contained by this article as well for any and all copyright infringements by authors and writers. E-articles is a free information resource. If you suspect this article for any copyright infringement, please read the terms of service and contact us or use the "Report this article" button on this page to investigate the problem.
2) E-articles is not responsible for inaccuracies, falsehoods, or any other types of misinformation this article may contain and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on the information gained here. |
|||||||||||||
